After telecommunications companies revealed on Friday afternoon how Ugandans will be paying for social media taxes, a reflection of government’s commitment to collect the controversial levies, a heated debate was prompted across various platforms of exchange of information.
Though the opinions are still binary, scrolling through social media or skimming through information produced by some mainstream media houses, one can tell that the overwhelming majority of Ugandans are opposed to the initiative.
As the spirited discussions raged on, especially on Twitter, some tweeps decided to tag Frank Tumwebaze, the minister of Information, Technology and Communications, calling for his opinion on the matter.
At about an hour or so of an intense debate that highlighted how the tax was unfair, with some punching holes in its mode of implementation, Minister Tumwebaze finally calmed down the tension, calling on bodies under his ministry – Uganda Communications Commission, National Information Technology Authority and the ICT Association of Uganda – to convene a dialogue where people can be able to give their opinions that will help chart the way forward.
@Tybisa @MoICT_Ug @UCC_Official @UCC_ED @NITAUganda1 @ICTAUg let's plan a sectoral dialogue on this and we discuss these logically and with facts. Any distortions if any will be rectified. https://t.co/94l7mSvALG
— Frank K Tumwebaze,MP : Psalms 124 : 1-8 (@FrankTumwebazek) June 29, 2018
Whether the suggested dialogue will yield results or not, can be based on a series of events that have unfolded right from the beginning. First of all, when President Museveni proposed the taxes on social media, he said he wanted to reduce on gossip that was becoming prominent on the platforms. This had been preceded by blocking of social media during presidential elections.
But, quite surprisingly, a few weeks later, Tumwebaze said the president was being misquoted, saying that the taxes were meant to fight foreign content to encourage local content developers to create social chatting tools that won’t be taxed.
Tumwebaze has since changed his position, and he is currently saying that the taxes are good since they will help in increasing broadband strength so that all people are connected to the internet. He has even told those who are saying their social media-hinged businesses might collapse due to reduced traffic that it’s by strengthening the broadband infrastructure that most people will be connected to the internet.
Yes I agree. Also many students in many universities &schools in many parts of Uganda need their labs connected to broadband so that they can be able to surf and facilitate their research. Reason why #govt is mobilizing tax revenues to roll out this crucial #ICT infrastructure https://t.co/UNkkvEBwt2
— Frank K Tumwebaze,MP : Psalms 124 : 1-8 (@FrankTumwebazek) June 29, 2018
Aside from the above, the government says it wants to increase its revenue base, considering a significant portion of the current budget is being funded through borrowing and support from development partners. This is not about to be solved.
If all goes as planned, tomorrow, Sunday, is the day when we shall all be blocked from accessing social media until we pay the tax. But questions have also come up, with some pointing at the increased expenditure companies are going to spend running social media on their computers for all their workers. The method of paying has not yet been revealed. And most ISPs are yet to show how they will be collecting the money.
For those who intended to VPNs to escape the taxes, the revenue collection body showed that they are also among the Over The Top Services, hence they are subjected to the tax. But, even if VPNs were not being taxed, its actually more costly using a VPN, in terms of data bundles, than paying the social media tax.
Meanwhile, a group of lawyers, including Silver Kayondo and Daniel Bill Opio are on Monday filing a case in the Constitutional Court seeking to block the social media taxes.
The #SocialMediaTax petition is cooking a delicious action against this tax before the courts of Law on Monday. Am persuaded about our Counsel and the team. @SilverKayondo @KasUganda @InnoJustice @Cyber__Line#CyberLinethenewsolution #TechGenerationLawyers #UgandaSocialMedia
— Daniel Bill Opio?? (@BillOpio) June 29, 2018
I have joined friends at CyberLine to file a case against the government of #Uganda challenging tax on #OTTs eg #socialmedia platforms. In my Affidavit, I contend that the tax offends the principles of #NetNeutrality & Open #internet. We must protect Ugandan e-commerce businesses
— Silver Kayondo (@SilverKayondo) June 29, 2018
Below are some of the reactions:
Consultations should have happened before, but this is welcome anyway. Good thing is your one Minister who responds in real time to issues
— Emmanuel Ajal (@emmyajal) June 29, 2018
@Parliament_Ug consented&passed it. Taxes help to finance service delivery. My worry is not about the small levy on #OTTs. Its on achieving universal broadband connectivity, that is what will make data costs low. If the levy on #OTTs can help on broadband roll out then ok for me https://t.co/fW7JRdjrwA
— Frank K Tumwebaze,MP : Psalms 124 : 1-8 (@FrankTumwebazek) June 29, 2018
Hey @FrankTumwebazek, I just want to ask a humble question….You can choose to answer it or Ignore it, it’s Okay!
“In your capacity as ICT Minister you consented to the Social Media Tax and are totally okay with Social Media being Taxed in Uganda?”
— Payo (@enywaru) June 29, 2018
We are in!
— ICT Association of UG. (ICTAU) (@ICTAUg) June 29, 2018
Thank you Hon. @FrankTumwebazek for this initiative. We are ready to play our part in this dialogue.
— NITA-Uganda (@NITAUganda1) June 30, 2018
Govt is taxing freely available services. Most of the people don't pay for these services and they don't make any money from them. I think it'd have made a bit more sense taxing Internet access, or people/businesses that earn from them.
— David Mpagi (@avrain27) June 29, 2018
Hon, We should have an hour where tweeps can ask your office questions about the new tax.
For clarity— Rutayisire Meddy (@Rutayisire_) June 29, 2018
The problem here is, https://t.co/PRA00uyYuf are taking a wrong assumption that everyone can afford 6k on top of buying data bundles. As a leader, you gat consider even the lowest income earner and his ability to pay the levy you consider 'small'.Ugx.200 is someone's dailybundlle
— Musinguzi Kevin ☆ ?? (@_M_Kevin) June 29, 2018
Ok since you say we do this soberly…. What's your timeframe until the infrastructure you hope to build comes online? Until I get more clients? Starting tomorrow, my page's rich will die by thousands.
When is your broadband coming to my rescue?— Kamya Samuel (@KamyaSamuel) June 29, 2018
Spot on Henry https://t.co/O2NdEhaBBP
— Frank K Tumwebaze,MP : Psalms 124 : 1-8 (@FrankTumwebazek) June 29, 2018